For the reason that “mansion tax” took impact final April, a bevy of teams have aired their grievances.
Builders declare the tax eats into their revenue margins, stifling new housing tasks. Business property house owners say their gross sales of warehouses and retail areas shouldn’t be topic to one thing that was billed as a “mansion tax.”
Now, a brand new voice is becoming a member of the refrain of complaints: nonprofit housing organizations.
Within the final 12 months, a pair of nonprofits coughed up a mixed $6.1 million in mansion tax charges. Their leaders say the tax has hampered their potential to perform considered one of Measure ULA’s main objectives: present inexpensive housing.
Handed in 2022, Measure ULA introduced a 4% switch tax to all L.A. property gross sales above $5 million and a 5.5% tax to gross sales above $10 million. Up to now, it has raised greater than $439 million for inexpensive housing and homelessness prevention initiatives.
Bob Beitcher, chief govt of the Movement Image & Tv Fund charity group, was happy when voters accredited ULA, saying that the town advantages when millionaires and billionaires pay their justifiable share.
However when the group offered off $30 million price of land, it needed to pay $1.65 million in “mansion tax” cash.
Since MPTF’s mission appeared to align with Measure ULA’s mission of combating L.A.’s housing disaster, Beitcher assumed the sale could be eligible for an exemption.
“Why us? We by no means thought we’d be paying this tax,” Beitcher stated. “Once you hear mansion tax, you assume millionaires and billionaires. We’re not promoting a mansion, we’re a nonprofit.”
MPTF helps folks within the film and TV industries with housing, monetary help and healthcare. It homes about 250 folks on its 40-acre campus in Woodland Hills, subsidizing dwelling prices for about 70 of them.
These subsidies — which embody hire, medical bills and transportation to medical doctors’ workplaces — value about $3 million per 12 months. And for the previous few years, the group has been struggling to maintain up with prices.
In consequence, the group offered a bit of its campus — roughly 19 acres of undeveloped land — to lift cash. It accomplished the deal in December 2023, promoting the land to California Business Funding Group, which is growing the positioning right into a 300-unit luxurious senior dwelling neighborhood.
Exemptions can be found to property house owners who promote to inexpensive housing builders. However since MPTF offered the property to a luxurious developer, it didn’t qualify.
An aerial view of MPTF’s 40-acre campus, which the nonprofit offered roughly 19 acres of final 12 months for $30 million.
(MPTF)
MPTF nonetheless walked away with $28.35 million — a large chunk that can assist it proceed its mission. However the tax nonetheless got here as a shock.
Beitcher requested round about an exemption for the $1.65-million tax invoice however was shut down attributable to an odd wrinkle within the provision.
Underneath Measure ULA, exemptions may be granted for nonprofits with a historical past of inexpensive housing growth, however provided that the nonprofit is the client within the transaction. If the nonprofit is the vendor — even when it’s a company whose work aligns with the objectives of Measure ULA — it’s on the hook for the tax.
“It doesn’t make sense {that a} struggling nonprofit offering housing could be paying the tax,” Beitcher stated. “The tax was meant to maintain folks housed, fed and secure off the streets. That’s precisely what we’ve been doing for 83 years, so why are you taking cash out of our pockets?”
Sometimes, nonprofits aren’t promoting tens of tens of millions of {dollars} price of land, so the state of affairs is considerably uncommon. However Beitcher stated uncommon or not, there must be a greater resolution.
“Nobody imagined this situation when the regulation was constructed. And we’re paying the worth for it,” Beitcher stated.
Joe Donlin, who serves as director of United to Home L.A., the group behind Measure ULA, stated the exemption guidelines have been designed to incentivize gross sales to nonprofit inexpensive housing builders as one other avenue to construct much-needed items. Each vendor has that possibility, but when they select to promote to another person, they gained’t qualify for an exemption.
Exemptions are dealt with by two departments, relying on the sort: the Workplace of Finance and the Housing Division.
Up to now, the 2 have been doling out ULA exemptions to those that qualify. The Workplace of Finance has granted 35 exemptions, and the Housing Division has granted 14. There have been 670 gross sales taxed beneath ULA and 49 whole exemptions, so roughly 7% of “mansion tax” sellers have been granted exemptions.
“We’re delicate to these unusual conditions, but it surely’s additionally necessary to acknowledge that just about 60% of voters accredited Measure ULA, and we’re implementing it,” stated Greg Good, director of strategic engagement and coverage for the Housing Division.
Final month, a nonprofit racked up a good larger tax invoice than MPTF.
In October, Los Angeles Jewish Well being, a senior healthcare nonprofit, offered a senior dwelling advanced in Playa Vista for $81 million. It discovered a purchaser in late 2020, however the sale course of took so lengthy that Measure ULA was proposed, handed and applied earlier than the deal closed.
In consequence, the nonprofit, which gives look after 4,000 seniors, was blindsided with a $4.455-million tax beneath Measure ULA.
The group meant to make use of a bit of the proceeds to develop inexpensive housing, noting the plan within the escrow directions of the $81-million sale. However now, that’s in jeopardy.
“It’s a disgrace as a result of that’s cash we might have used for inexpensive housing,” stated CEO Dale Surowitz. “Now that plan is in danger.”
Surowitz stated he’s been working with Metropolis Councilmember Bob Blumenfield to get the $4.455 million again, both via an exemption or by having it reinvested within the nonprofit, however stated there aren’t clear avenues for that to occur.
“I don’t assume they deliberate for this,” Surowitz stated. “I can’t think about them wanting a nonprofit concerned with caring for individuals who don’t have monetary assets to pay the tax, as a result of that was the intention of ULA.”
